Athlon vs. PIII
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Troy Baer troy at osc.eduTue Feb 20 07:59:03 PST 2001
- Previous message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Next message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Ole W. Saastad wrote:
> I have run a few tests to check the performance of
> Athlon vs. PIII.
> The Atlas (tuned BLAS libs) tests suggest very high
> performance for Athlon, however in real tests like
> Gaussian 98 there is little difference.
>
>
> Summary of performance Athlon vs. PIII
>
> - with Gaussian98 runs.
>
> pgf77 (cache size 512k)
> Athlon: 22 minutes 26.8 seconds.
> PIII: 17 minutes 57.3 seconds.
>
> pgf77 (cache size 64k)
> Athlon: 23 minutes 5.8 seconds.
> PIII: 17 minutes 56.3 seconds.
[snip]
> Compiled with pgf77.
>
> pgf77 -O2 -tp p6 -Munroll -Mvect=cachesize:524288 -c redund.f
^^^^^^
> Cache size 512k.
> Included Blas code compiled.
Compiling with "-tp p6" is arguably the wrong thing to do on an Athlon, if
that's what you did. Try either compiling with "-tp athlon" on the Athlon
or leaving out the -tp flag altogether (the compiler is supposed to figure
out what processor it's on if it's not specified).
Also, enabling prefetching (-Mvect=prefetch) may improve performance by
10-15% on both the Pentium III and the Athlon.
--Troy
--
Troy Baer email: troy at osc.edu
Science & Technology Support phone: 614-292-9701
Ohio Supercomputer Center web: http://oscinfo.osc.edu
- Previous message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Next message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
