Athlon vs. PIII
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Luc Vereecken Luc.Vereecken at chem.kuleuven.ac.beTue Feb 20 07:45:48 PST 2001
- Previous message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Next message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 14:36 20/02/01 +0100, Ole W. Saastad wrote: Strange. I did a G98 test last year, and I found that the athlon was 10-20 % faster than a PIII for CPU intensive calculations (HF/DFT/...). Are both systems comparable in cache-speed / memory speed and size / .. ? For my test system I went as far as transferring the disks and memory chips between the different mobos. Luc Vereecken >I have run a few tests to check the performance of >Athlon vs. PIII. >The Atlas (tuned BLAS libs) tests suggest very high >performance for Athlon, however in real tests like >Gaussian 98 there is little difference. > > >Summary of performance Athlon vs. PIII > >- with Gaussian98 runs. > >pgf77 (cache size 512k) >Athlon: 22 minutes 26.8 seconds. >PIII: 17 minutes 57.3 seconds. > >pgf77 (cache size 64k) >Athlon: 23 minutes 5.8 seconds. >PIII: 17 minutes 56.3 seconds. > >
- Previous message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Next message: Athlon vs. PIII
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
