Unisys
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comMon Feb 19 23:25:32 PST 2001
- Previous message: Unisys
- Next message: Medical Area for Beowulf ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:18:32PM -0500, Alan Grimes wrote: > Hey, I followed some links off the windoze $2000 site and came across > some 32 way/64gb systems from Unisys! (Xenon) > > It would surely outperform a PC cluster and be WAY easier to program > than today's beowulf software... Though I'm not sure about the price or > linux compatability, these are really extreme. > > Linux REALLY REALLY sucks in a lot of ways... =( The whole point of Beowulf clusters is that PC clusters are often way cheaper to do the same work. And the programming thing is a religious war; the opinion you give is often repeated by folks who like designing shared memory machines, but all of the fastest machines in the world use message-passing hardware. If you want ease of programming, you need software systems like this one, which runs efficiently on message-passing hardware while providing a compiler-directive based interface: http://www-ad.fsl.noaa.gov/ac/sms.html -- greg
- Previous message: Unisys
- Next message: Medical Area for Beowulf ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
