memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Daniel Ridge newt at scyld.comFri Feb 16 13:04:23 PST 2001
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan, > I recently installed Scyld Beowulf on our cluster. It works fine, but when > I use BeoStatus to look at the slaves it shows that the slaves all have > about 400MB of their memory taken up. Anyone know what is eating up the RAM > on those slaves? Each node has a total of 512MB of RAM. Why is beowulf > eating up so much of it? Thanks. Try 'bpsh 0 free' for detailed statistics. Is this memory just buffers? Otherwise, if you are using a ram disk root, you could accidentally have specified a ramdisk size which is an order of magnitude too large in /etc/beowulf/fstab. Regards, Dan Ridge Scyld Computing Corporation
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list