Scyld and Red Hat 7
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
kragen at pobox.com kragen at pobox.comTue Feb 6 11:11:46 PST 2001
- Previous message: SysKonnect
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Stephen Gaudet" <sgaudet at atipa.com> writes: > > The one reason that could make me upgrade is the installation of a 2.4 > > kernel. Since RH 7.0 does not have it, there is no reason to upgrade yet. > > Here's another reason you might be interested in if looking to use large > data sets. Presumably you're talking about being interested in 2.4, not RH 7. > Latest Linux kernel holds appeal for IT > > The keepers of the Linux operating system have made improvements to the core > technology that should make it easier to find lost data. > The biggest addition to the release of Linux kernel 2.4.1 is the ReiserFS, > which is a journaling file system. Journaling file systems are key to > operating systems and applications used over extended corporate networks > because they allow administrators to more quickly recover data in the event > of system failure. IMHO, this is not a particularly good explanation of the situation; metadata-journaling filesystems like ReiserFS sacrifice a little performance in the average case (when everything is working fine) to make fscking after a crash very quick. If you're losing any significant amount of your cluster time to fscking, you probably have bigger problems that you should address first.
- Previous message: SysKonnect
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
