Scyld and Red Hat 7
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
W Bauske wsb at paralleldata.comThu Feb 1 14:54:51 PST 2001
- Previous message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Siegert wrote: > > That's one of the reasons why I want to go to the 2.4 kernel: NFS-v3 > And as long as I can do it without going to glibc-2.2 I'll probably > upgrade. Now it doesn't look as if RH will be releasing a 2.4 kernel > rpm for 6.2 (although I can't see a reason why they couldn't). > [side remark: is there LFS (large file support > 2GB) in the 2.4 kernel?] I run 2.4.x on two x86's with LFS working. Not too heavy of testing but it seems to behave. You do need to compile your code with the correct defines to access them. Also, on a RH6.2 system, you need to recompile certain other programs with the right defines too, like your shell. Wes
- Previous message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Next message: Scyld and Red Hat 7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list