diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David van der Spoel spoel at xray.bmc.uu.seThu Dec 6 00:58:53 PST 2001
- Previous message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Velocet wrote: >Wondering why everyone gets local drives here - do you people have >computational software that needs to write scratch or swap faster than >100Mbps (12.5MB/s) or even GBE (125MB/s theoretical, 35-50MB/s actual)? Isnt >that fast enough? > >Why arent diskless netbooting clusters more popular? Because you should divide the real disk througput on the server by the amount of nodes, plus add the latency for setting up a connection. If you have only slightly disk-intensive applications (e.g. quantum chemistry) this will severely slow down your calculations. We are using a home-grown installation, basically redhat kickstart. We take 1 Gb for the OS, 2 Gb swap and the rest (6-30 Gb) /tmp. That works nicely for us and disks are cheap enough. Groeten, David. ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. David van der Spoel, Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755 spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Previous message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
