What is the best C IDE on Linux?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bob Drzyzgula bob at drzyzgula.orgFri Apr 27 04:35:30 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Fwd: What is the best C IDE on Linux?
- Next message: What is the best C IDE on Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> EMACS need only be "started up" once; on one machine and > then remote logins and software updates on your many other > machines is a breeze--once you develop a few macros of > course--hence the name "Editor MACroS". Interesting. With vi, you don't *have* to develop anything, it all just works, out of the box. You *can* develop macros for vi (ever see the towers of hanoi demonstration?) but people don't do it that often. To a large extent, this is because the basic editor is so fast, memory-effecient and functional there is rarely the need, but it is also because vi integrates so well with the underlying command line environment. Need to reflow a paragraph to a max 65 columns? "!}fmt -65" will do it for you. Need to sort the contents of your buffer? "1G!}sort". Need to insert the system date in your file? ":r!date". The Unix command line is fantastically powerful; why would anyone want to re-implement this functionality within the editor itself? > EMACS is the best IDE on Linux on any platform and for any > language. I think that the point is that this is highly subjective and dependant on your skills, background, responsibilities, task at hand and a host of other factors. There IS NO BEST IDE, there are only IDEs that are optimal for an individual in a particular set of circumstances. --Bob
- Previous message: Fwd: What is the best C IDE on Linux?
- Next message: What is the best C IDE on Linux?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
