Debian vs RedHat config question.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kino L Davis wulfworks at nanux.comSat Apr 21 12:18:51 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Scyld problems
- Next message: channel bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > For eg, since debian 2.2 doenst have glibc2.2, is it alot slower than > > redhat 7? Has anyone tried out progeny debian? (It supposedly has > > glibc2.2). > > > > /kc Have been running Progeny for about a month now, so far I have not used it in a cluster, as I wanted to play with it some and wait for the final version (which is now out). Impression: VERY nice work, the SMP system it is on is very stable and marginally faster than the previous SuSE 7.0 install and a brief debacle with Slackware current, which seems to be facing its demise?. I am still running RC1 on the system, but will change that over to Progeny 1.0 just as soon as I finish this email (backing up mail now). Keep in mind this is not based on any specific tests, just an overall impression after using it on my desktop workstation... but, I am happy enough with it that I have already started duplicating CDs and contacted Progeny about Reseller status -- in a nut shell, it is Debian that has addressed most of the (few) complaints that people have had. I do not know how it stacks up against 2.2r3, as I have just got the masters for that newest potato release... but I hope to install it on a system this weekend also. Oh, and yes, it is glibc 2.2
- Previous message: Scyld problems
- Next message: channel bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
