Stream variation
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comThu Apr 26 18:43:44 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Stream variation
- Next message: 2.2.16 kernel panic (Scyld)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:37:15AM -0700, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > Running 2 instances of Stream at the same time on several Netfinity x330 > Dual PIII boxes, I see a variation of performance from one node to another > one, from 185 MB/s to 260 MB/s per run for TRIAD for example. Running 2 instances of stream? Well, that depends on the details. You see, stream takes the best time and uses that to give the answer. So if once the 2 instances begin running at exactly the same time, you get one answer, and if the 2 instances start at different times so that each one gets a full cycle without the other one going, you get a much better answer. If this effect is getting you, then the results shouldn't be repeatable on an individual machine. > Have you seen so large variation between identical nodes in a cluster > before ? Do you have any ideas ? (temperature, cheesy chipset, ghost in > the machine, ...) I've never seen variations so large. But I usually run one instance that runs for a very long time (10x normal), and use the time for a second normal instance. That's a lot more stable for the problem I described. -- g
- Previous message: Stream variation
- Next message: 2.2.16 kernel panic (Scyld)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
