Which 1000BASE-T is better?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
J. G. LaBounty jgl at unix.shell.comThu Apr 19 10:21:39 PDT 2001
- Previous message: BLAST or wu-blast for beowulf?
- Next message: Which 1000BASE-T is better?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>We want to buy a Gigabit card for our master node, we have found these >cards: > > - 3Com 3C-996-T > - Intel PRO / 1000T > - Ovislink GE-2000N (Works under Linux?) > - Netgear GA-620-T > >Does Anybody say anything about these cards? > >Are there others cards better? We have used the Intel Pro / 1000T. Intel has linux drivers for both the 2.2 and 2.4 kernels. Using 3 streams of ftp to between 2 gigabit ports, I have gotten a 59MBS aggregrate but cpu busy goes to 93% on a dual 800MHz system. The 2.4 kernel can do about 50% better on the same test. The two hosts were connected by HP4000 switch. John
- Previous message: BLAST or wu-blast for beowulf?
- Next message: Which 1000BASE-T is better?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
