netgear gigabit tuning
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jes Sorensen jes at linuxcare.comMon Apr 16 14:14:57 PDT 2001
- Previous message: netgear gigabit tuning
- Next message: compiling beompi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Please Send ALL responses to the acenic list and NOT my private mailbox! >>>>> "Chris" == Chris Black <cblack at eragen.com> writes: Chris> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:47:15PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> I'd be highly surprised if the NetGear switch supports Jumbo frames, >> hence the transfer problem. Chris> But shouldn't I be able to use a slightly larger mtu? What should Chris> I set the mtu at? Most Ethernet switches only support the default MTU size. >> What kinda of application are you using on what kinda hardware? Chris> Using pftp <www.pftp.de> to do file transfer on large files (30GB Chris> files). But the results I got were from a bandwidth test that Chris> pftp offers. Any suggestions on network tuning? pftp is likely to be a bad benchmark unless it does in fact set proper socket buffers and does large write()'s. Admittedly I don't know pftp well, but anything that has the word 'ftp' in it's name gives me bad connotations. Jes
- Previous message: netgear gigabit tuning
- Next message: compiling beompi
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list