Replacing NFS.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comTue Apr 10 20:34:55 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Replacing NFS.
- Next message: Replacing NFS.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[speaking of AFS] > ( non-broken caching is one of the best reasons to use AFS in a > cluster of workstations ) One man's non-broken is another man's broken. NFS supports only a limited range of policies, and AFS merely supports a different range of policies, some of which may work well for you, but can be pathologically bad in some circumstances, just like everything else has its weak points. AFS is also a pain in the neck to compile, and the tokens are a pain to deal with in a batch setting -- again, only a limited range of policies are supported. And we won't talk about scalability. -- greg
- Previous message: Replacing NFS.
- Next message: Replacing NFS.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
