Shared Memory: Solaris vs. Linux
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at coffee.psychology.mcmaster.caFri Apr 6 09:56:07 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Shared Memory: Solaris vs. Linux
- Next message: Does Linux support Multiple threads?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I am reading some material on Shared Memory - it states, "In the Solaris > 2.x operating system, the most efficient way to implement shared memory > applications is to rely on the mmap() function and on the system's > native virtual memory facility. Solaris 2.x also supports System V well, once the memory is shared (mapped into all sharee's address spaces), there's no efficiency issue. but the mmap version (parent creates some anonymous mmaped space, which is inherited across fork) certainly doesn't require the extra syscalls that sysv shm does. > Question: I assume Linux has the same support - a version of mmap()? sure. you can use the mmap trick wherever you find mmap. > Does Linux also support System V shared memory? of course.
- Previous message: Shared Memory: Solaris vs. Linux
- Next message: Does Linux support Multiple threads?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
