ServerWorks chipset
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
J. G. LaBounty jgl at unix.shell.comThu Sep 21 05:21:05 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Monoprocessor o Bi-processor nodes?, K7 or Pentium III?
- Next message: ServerWorks chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We have both the Tyan Thunder 2500 (S1867DUAN) and the SuperMicro 370DLE in house for testing. We are trying to decide which board to use for a new cluster we are building. For the tests, we are using RedHat 6.2. and 6.1. The first board we tried was the SuperMicro 370DLE. It installs without a problem. Our benchmarks showed we were not getting the performance increased we expected. The original benchmark was run on an ASUS P2B-D with 600Mhz Pentium III processors. On the SuperMicro, we were using an 800Mhz processor and expected to see an increase of 33%. We only achieved a 20% increase in the performance. I did run cpu-rate from Robert Brown and it showed a 33% gain for the default test. On the Tyan, we ran into problems. The default 2.2.14 kernel installs ok but when we move up to the 2.2.16 kernel ( as we did on Supermicro ), the system hangs on reboot, and you can't boot back to the 2.2.14 default system. So far we have not resolved this problem. It appears to be related to lilo because reboots work till you run lilo after upgrading the kernel. We fell back to RedHat 6.1 and system works ok with the motherboard, including loading a kernel built for this configuration. The benchmarks for this motherboard gave us the performance increase we were expecting about 33%. We really do like this board because of the 8 dimm slots. So far, we have only tested to 1gb memory but plan to get more next week. With two onboard SCSI, which we don't want, and a builtin ethernet makes this board's biggest drawback the cost. We also tested a Microstar 694D based on the VIA chipset. The install for this board went ok for 6.2 but on the first reboot we took an oops. We were able to boot the single processor image and then build a SMP version for 2.2.16. The performance gain for this mother board was only 15% for our benchmarks. If our budget can stand it, we will proably select the Tyan board because of the performance and the 8 dimm slots. John LaBounty
- Previous message: Monoprocessor o Bi-processor nodes?, K7 or Pentium III?
- Next message: ServerWorks chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
