A kernel level message passing service
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl glindahl at hpti.comFri Sep 1 13:29:09 PDT 2000
- Previous message: A kernel level message passing service
- Next message: A kernel level message passing service
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> (I wonder sometimes > if the heavy machinery of TCP really makes sense in the context > of private, switched networks. does anyone have a count of dropped > frames inside a normal cluster?) No, but I can give you lists of machines which were unusable because they assumed such errors were very infrequent, and didn't deal with them. ASCI Blue Mountain is one example. They had to add a rather expensive and annoying reliability layer to correct the problem. Issues like that are why Myricom's GM driver provides reliable, in-order delivery, even though it hurts their small-message latency. If you want to use unreliable ethernet user-level networking, there's already one out there. -- g
- Previous message: A kernel level message passing service
- Next message: A kernel level message passing service
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
