A kernel level message passing service
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David spoel at xray.bmc.uu.seFri Sep 1 04:23:35 PDT 2000
- Previous message: A kernel level message passing service
- Next message: A kernel level message passing service
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote: >I think, at least at first blush, that this could be a really welcome >addition for those of us performing message passing and using scalable >parallelism in this forum (OK, flashy words to say, "All of us."). That >said, I think we need to think through this and see if it would be >something Linus could implement into a production kernel without >forking, or would we cause a kernel fork that would cause us to lose the >benefit of continued development, and have to reintegrate the messaging >functionality patch into each subsequent release? Of course this could be developed into the linux kernel as an option during compilation. The same goes for Josep Loncaric's patches for low latency. It need not be built into mainstream kernels, but could be a configuration option. To be acceptable for the LK gurus it should not introduce any security problems of course. Groeten, David. ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. David van der Spoel Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry s-mail: Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden e-mail: spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se www: http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Previous message: A kernel level message passing service
- Next message: A kernel level message passing service
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
