Compile farm?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.czSun Oct 8 22:26:53 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments. 10/7, 10:43
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Problem is - mosix migrates jobs after a while. Initially a compiler >> takes up a few megabytes of memory, but "after a while" it has grown >> to hundreds of megabytes. When mosix decides to migrate the compiler >> it will spend a long time on the netowrk to move the large process >> image. > >I've never used Mosix. Does it have the ability to set policies like >"this binary should always be immediately migrated at exec" or "all >processes should be migrated at exec"? You'd think it would... and >using such policies would solve this particular problem. I have one more question - is Mosix able to avoid multiple copying of shared libraries (e.g. to do something like Scyld bproc does) ? Or other way around, these hundreds of megabytes are shared librarier which got mapped "after a while", or something else ? Vaclav
- Previous message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments. 10/7, 10:43
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
