UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
alukkari at lce.hut.fi
Tue Oct 31 07:27:56 PST 2000
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> > I am looking at two different configurations of 600Mhz, 2M cache alpha
> > 21264w
> > 6*2 processor UP2000, 512M RAM
> > or
> > 12*1 processor DS10L 256M RAM
In our case we chose DS10 machines because of their better memory
performance compared to UP2000.
> You might also prefer the DS10 over the DS10L, since it costs money to get
> that 1U package.
This is true. In our case Compaq seemed to be much more
interested in selling DS10 models instead of their slim versions.
I suppose they can get more money by selling slim models to commercial sector
and standard models (DS10) to universities.
Another thing to keep in mind is the heat.
I don't know what is the situation today, but I have
heard that Compaq used to have somekind of heat problems with
fully loaded DS10L racks.
in addition, I do not know if Compaq even has
DS10L version of their fastest DS10 models.
Ari Lukkarinen ; Email: Ari.Lukkarinen at hut.fi
Laboratory of Computational Engineering / Helsinki University of Technology
More information about the Beowulf