UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl glindahl at hpti.comMon Oct 30 06:27:39 PST 2000
- Previous message: UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
- Next message: UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I am looking at two different configurations of 600Mhz, 2M cache alpha > 21264w > 6*2 processor UP2000, 512M RAM > or > 12*1 processor DS10L 256M RAM Christoph's answer was very good, but I would add that you might want to consider the other products in this space, namely the DS20E and the UP1100. The DS20E has DDR Sram cache, which is a 10% to 30% boost to some codes. You'll have to ask API when they plan on releasing DDR Sram, I believe it's fairly soon. The UP1100 has an AMD chipset so has significantly slower stream numbers, but it's cheap, and your codes might not be sensitive to stream bandwidths. You might also prefer the DS10 over the DS10L, since it costs money to get that 1U package. > One thing that is a bit worrying is having two processors talking > through one PCI bus to the high speed network. I have not seen a problem with that. On a wide range of codes, I think the bigger factor is memory bandwidth. > Does anyone have two processor stream numbers for > UP2000s? Around 1300, or 1.1X-1.2X the single processor number. The DS20E is only slightly higher. The ES40 gets 2.5X with 4 CPUs, not so great. That's why I'm still a fan of single cpu machines, myself. -- g
- Previous message: UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
- Next message: UP2000 vs DS10 for beowulf?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
