(trans)portable Beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduTue Nov 14 06:01:27 PST 2000
- Previous message: (trans)portable Beowulf
- Next message: (trans)portable Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Ken wrote: > Jim Lux wrote: > > > > > > Real power consumption - how much current on each voltage is being drawn by > > a typical motherboard? > > My whole system, - monitor of course, draws about .77 amps nominal, and > .97 amps with both processors fully loaded. (Dual 466 Celeron's) I > didn't try pulling the rest of the components. I wasn't interested in > that at the time I checked. I think that this is fairly typical. This has been discussed before -- do a search on the list archives. I think that "most" systems consume 70-100 watts (which is the important measure, not current per se, as you'll be providing the current at a different voltage). However, it varies depending on just what you have on your system. A box with four hard drives, max memory, a CD, a floppy, a big/fast video card, and a couple or three NICs will consume a bit more than a bare ATX motherboard with a single PXE NIC, a CPU, and enough memory to run. You don't mention budget (that I recall) in your project description. If "price is no object" you might look carefully at e.g. laptop-based components. There are matched CPU, motherboard, memory sets out there that consume far less power than an ATX motherboard and OTC CPUs. I think I recall IBM just announcing something that will allow their newest laptops to run 8 hours active on a single charge. I'm certain that these systems are more expensive (by a factor of 2-4, maybe?) than a straight ATX-based solution, but you might try talking IBM into "participating" with you on the project and selling you e.g. 8 filled motherboards for a nominal price -- it would be great press for them if you were to build an 8 CPU beowulf that would fit into the volume of a carryon bag and run 24 hours on a car battery. You might even convince them to make it the prototype of a new product -- stick a folddown flatpanel monitor and keyboard on top of it with a switch, put a little 8 port 100Base switch inside and voila! IBM's new "field supercomputer". The military would probably lap it up. Also remember that with Scyld, the nodes can be REALLY thin -- as you note, PXE NIC, CPU, memory. I don't even see the point of a video interface, once you have the nodes configured to boot via the NIC and without video or keyboard (which might require a single trip through the BIOS). Once configured, they boot. Once booted, they run. If there are problems that survive a power cycle, they are almost certainly hardware. So carry spare parts and a single cheap video card that you can move around to debug hardware problems, maybe. Remember that every additional entity (video, sound, whatever) on the node motherboards consumes power, and keeping power down BOTH lets you run longer AND lets you run cooler. A desktop ATX-motherboard based system is likely to draw at least 400 watts on 8 nodes, and car batteries (or any other kind of portable battery that weighs less than 1 pound/watt provided) get tired real fast at this sort of draw level. I really think that you're going to HAVE to look for very low power solutions and get your 8 node consumption down in the 100-200 watt level or even less or you'll only be able to run for around an hour or two absolute max with the car turned off or no generator running. Another company to check out is Transmeta (Linus Torvald's employer). Their "Crusoe" processor is featured in e.g. the Sony VAIO C1 ultralight notebook. The TM processors are designed to have extremely low power draw and internal idle modes to conserve power even further. You could actually probably build your whole beowulf out of a stack of VAIO C1's, in which case the finished 8 node unit would likely weigh about 22 pounds and would run for about 5 hours in the field (presuming you can find or cobble together a low power 9 port switch and a battery to run it for 5 hours standalone). Of course, it would probably cost a lot compared to a conventional beowulf, but then, one cannot carry a conventional beowulf -- and your lunch -- to the top of a volcano or out into the desert in a single backpack and use it there for half a day. Be very careful -- I know of no benchmarks for the TM CPUs and so I have no idea how their clock translates into e.g. MFLOPS in a HPC application. You would almost certainly want to benchmark them before considering this. Again, talk to Transmeta and see if they are willing to "participate" and make hardware available to you at cost for the publicity. If you could get the raw motherboards, CPUs, PCMCIA interface and memory and could leave off the monitors, floppies, keyboards, sound and so forth you could probably lighten the load and reduce power. Even if you can only get the notebooks, if you are willing to do a little mechanical surgery you can probably strip off the folding display and keyboards (leaving plugs in place so you can use just one for any node if you need to). That might get your weight down to what, 15 pounds? Heck, my 15" laptop weighs more than half of that. Again, I'd guess that the army would just love a 10 pound supercomputer that could be attached to e.g. artillery pieces along with a GPS, an anemometer, a compass, a level and a gyroscope for inputs, be fed absolute coordinates, and proceed to calculate precise firing angles in real time correcting for things like latitude, absolute distance from the earth's axis of firing point and target point and so forth (e.g. coriolis forces). Oh, they may already have this sort of thing but then, they may not. The Star Wars folks will also NEED stuff like this and beyond if they are to have any hope of doing realtime corrections to inbound ballistic or actively redirected trajectories. You could likely put in a proposal and get them to fund the whole thing lavishly. Good luck. Sounds like an interesting idea. Please report to the list when you get it built and consider writing a fully descriptive "article" to be included as a section in the Beowulf book Doug Eadline and I are writing (and openly providing) online. We guarantee authorial recognition only, although who knows -- it might make money some day. rgb -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: (trans)portable Beowulf
- Next message: (trans)portable Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
