openAFS, any success?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jag agrajag at linuxpower.orgMon Nov 6 06:17:17 PST 2000
- Previous message: openAFS, any success?
- Next message: Cluster Monitoring software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Alex wrote: > > Hi, > > I've spent some time trying to install OpenAfs under a 2.2.16/x86/redhat-6.2 > distribution, but I am starting to wonder whether it actually compiles at > all. Does anyone have any success with openAFS? A comment about the > stability of AFS would be appreciated as well. Is there a mailing list on > openafs? I know a few people at NCSU and Duke that have gotten OpenAFS to compile and work under linux (they even made an .srpm). We use AFS on campus for just about everything at NCSU, but I don't think its a valid option for a beowulf cluster. There are a lot of features in AFS that make it great for a distributed network, but will probablly just add unneeded overhead in a beowulf cluster. Here are the OpenAFS mailing lists: http://lists-openafs.central.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi Jag PS the people I know who compiled OpenAFS did it on RH 7.0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20001106/012d4961/attachment.bin
- Previous message: openAFS, any success?
- Next message: Cluster Monitoring software?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
