A beowulf for parallel instruction.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
J, A. Llewellyn tony at usf.eduWed Nov 1 10:32:05 PST 2000
- Previous message: A beowulf for parallel instruction.
- Next message: A beowulf for parallel instruction.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Walter B Ligon III Your comments about instruction are well received. One of our objectives would be to prepare students to use the larger scale Beowulfs ( Beowolves? Someone needs to solve this problem ! ) which are becoming available as national facilities. I'd be interested in software comments in this area. Robert. G. Brown I'm relieved to find assurance about the boxes vs rackmounts issue since this issue is something we have discussed. The experiments you suggest are enticing but remember our primary objective is the software training end ( even if I didn't make it very clear in my post). The multiple small cluster suggestion is something that has also cropped up. I wonder what size we need in order to make the difficulty in parallelization organization to be apparent without it overwhelming the entire process. If we can bring this off with a half decent lab it will be marvelous. It looks as if we need to think in terms of under 32 nodes total, (all flavors) and assembling a list of candidate NICS, switches etc. Any priorities to suggest?
- Previous message: A beowulf for parallel instruction.
- Next message: A beowulf for parallel instruction.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
