Beowulf: A theorical approach
Walter B. Ligon III
walt at parl.ces.clemson.edu
Thu Jun 22 13:51:52 PDT 2000
Well, yeah, but its the PCI interface I'm talking about. Robert Brown's
posting was really more to the point. Build a NIC that interfaces
driectly to the CPU and memory.
> > The problem right now really isn't in link speeds (though better
> > link speeds are good), its in how close/far the network interface is
> > from the CPU. COTS HW doesn't place a high value on direct access
> > to IO devices - there is a higher value on a standardized bus
> > interface to allow different system components to be integrated and
> > updated independently. A "supercomputer" can have the network
> > engineered directly into the node architecture. This is a huge
> > advantage. Luckily, this advantage has the most effect in only some
> > programs.
> If Infiniband does all that it is supposed to do, then it will rapidly
> become the network of choice, since it _does_ have support for direct
> (user-space) access to the comms, and has some nifty switches.
> Of course in the short term it will be limited by the CPU side
> interfaces being PCI, but that's only the same limitation as
> for Quadrics, Myrinet, SCI and so on.
> Once it becomes the standard for connection to storage it _should_ be
> cheap, and a standard component of any "server-class" commodity
> machine, whether IA* or other architecture. (IBM announced that
> they'll be selling their interface chips and switches just today).
> So, I expect that Inifinband will be engineered intimately into the
> node architecture of COTS hardware, and that will help a lot.
> It'll be interesting how long it takes before the Linux drivers are
> available !
> -- Jim
> James Cownie <jcownie at etnus.com>
> Etnus, Inc. +44 117 9071438
Dr. Walter B. Ligon III
More information about the Beowulf