Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

Beowulf: A theorical approach

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.edu
Thu Jun 22 13:12:27 PDT 2000


On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, [iso-8859-1] Jakob Østergaard wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> 
> > > Just as a matter of curiosity -- Once upon a time some two or three
> > > years ago I suggested on the list that a development company consider
> > > building a network communications device that plugged into the second
> > > CPU slot of a dual CPU board.
> > 
> > It's hard to build something that plugs into an Intel-designed CPU bus.
> > Scali tried it and it didn't work so hot.
> 
> At least on Intel hardware, SMP systems have cache coherency in the hardware,
> and that's _expensive_ wrt. inter-cpu communication.  There's write snooping
> and all sorts of the strangest things happening.  I cannot imagine how this
> could work in any way over a network with any reasonable performance. Even
> given infinite bandwidth, I guess the latency from ten meters of copper wiring
> would kill performance.  (any sub-c interconnect would and tunneling is a few
> years away I guess  ;)

Not arguing with the difficulty of doing the local engineering, but from
whence the remarks concerning copper and latency?  It could be an
optical interconnect, or a three meter copper interconnect for all I
care.  Even ten meters is only 33 nanoseconds at c which is a WHOLE lot
smaller than the other sources of latency in a normal network
interconnect. I thought signals propagated on copper at an appreciable
fraction of c... am I missing something here?

Never mind.  I'll just go get the beer Greg suggested instead;-)

> > In 12 months, you'll be able to get either PCI-X machines or Infiniband
> > machines. PCI-X has split transactions, and Chuck Seitz, who knows more
> > about networking than all of us combined, says that PCI-X will get rid of
> > most of the PCI latency.
> > 
> > So, sit back, pop open a cold one, and wait.
> > 
> 
> I'm skeptical, but I'll take your advice here   :)

Yeah!

   rgb

Robert G. Brown	                       http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567  Fax: 919-660-2525     email:rgb at phy.duke.edu







More information about the Beowulf mailing list