Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Jim Phillips jim at ks.uiuc.edu
Mon Jun 12 15:06:45 PDT 2000


Hi,

Depending on the features you require, NAMD is compatible with CHARMM and
should scale better, especially on clusters.  New version out soon.

http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/

-Jim


On Wed, 7 Jun 2000 axelsen at axe1.med.upenn.edu wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> We are designing a cluster for which the most important code will be the
> computational chemistry program, CHARMM.  In our preliminary tests on
> an existing cluster, we have confirmed our expectation that interthread 
> communications will be our first bottleneck.  A test run on a typical 
> problem did not scale beyond 4 nodes on a cluster composed of P2-450
> processors and fast ethernet interconnections.  In contrast, the same
> code scales almost perfectly up to at least 12 processors on an SGI-Unix 
> SMP machine.  CHARMM uses PVM.
> 
> I would appreciate contact from anyone who has run CHARMM on a cluster
> and has considered the best way to make this code scale better.  From 
> anyone, I would appreciate general guidance on several issues:
> 
>  * If we go with pentium II/III processors, how far is Myrinet likely to
>    permit us to scale these calculations?
> 
>  * With Myrinet, would alpha nodes tend to scale any better than pentium nodes?
> 
>    (a single 500 MHz alpha processor is about 1.6-fold faster than a 
>     single 450 MHz P2 on a typical problem, but it is about 3-fold the
>     cost.  With this question, I am looking for any additional advantages 
>     of alpha to justify this cost)
> 
>  * Are there differences between different pentium chip sets that will impact
>    this problem?
> 
>  * Is there any advantage to buying dual-processor machines, either alpha
>    or pentium, with respect to scaling?  Any advantage to dedicating one 
>    processor in each dual-box to communications?  If we dedicate processors
>    in this way, would both processors have to have the same clock speed?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------- axe at pharm.med.upenn.edu -----------------
>                                                        
> Paul H. Axelsen               ....   ....  .   .  .   .
> Department of Pharmacology    .   .  .     ..  .  ..  .
> University of Pennsylvania    ....   ...   . . .  . . .
> 3620 Hamilton Walk            .      .     .  ..  .  ..
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084   .      ....  .   .  .   .
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list
> Beowulf at beowulf.org
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
> 





More information about the Beowulf mailing list