[Announce] The jobd Load Balancer
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Borries Demeler demeler at bioc09.v19.uthscsa.eduThu Jun 8 07:45:58 PDT 2000
- Previous message: [Announce] The jobd Load Balancer
- Next message: Please help me unsubscribe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I need GNU Make, so BSD pmake is out. Customs GNU Make doesn't work properly > and isn't maintained. PVM GNU Make may work, but didn't for me, I also have the > feeling that this is too much of a hack to be relied upon. GNU Queue was > close, except that it breaks under load. Generic NQS was too big (too slow for > short jobs, to complex). > > Fixing GNU Queue wasn't an option for me, with all due respect that is by far > the ugliest code I've seen in a long time. > I haven't tried it, but maybe someone else has and can comment: Doesn't Mosix allow for automatic process migration such that you could invoke a compilation with make -j <number_of_nodes> and have it compile in parallel? In any case, I would like to know if this is a feasable route for parallel compilation. Has anybody tried this and how would it compare in speed to something like jobd? Thanks for all responses! -Borries
- Previous message: [Announce] The jobd Load Balancer
- Next message: Please help me unsubscribe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
