Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl glindahl at hpti.comWed Jun 7 11:56:01 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures
- Next message: Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I would appreciate contact from anyone who has run CHARMM on a cluster > and has considered the best way to make this code scale better. From > anyone, I would appreciate general guidance on several issues: > > * If we go with pentium II/III processors, how far is Myrinet likely to > permit us to scale these calculations? > > * With Myrinet, would alpha nodes tend to scale any better than > pentium nodes? I only have *old* Alpha/Myrinet numbers, but they're considerably better on scaling than Intel ethernet, not that this is a surprise. Michael Crowley was supposed to send me a new copy of the code so I could do a complete comparison, but it hasn't happened yet. http://legion.virginia.edu/centurion/Applications.html -- greg
- Previous message: Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures
- Next message: Scalability of CHARMM on various architectures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
