Serverworks chip sets
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald B. Kinghorn kinghorn at pqs-chem.comFri Dec 8 07:57:18 PST 2000
- Previous message: Serverworks chip sets
- Next message: Serverworks chip sets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We've had good luck with the Supermicro 370DLE. Using high quality CAS 2 memory we saw significant speedup in our quantum chemistry codes. I'm also interested in the HE version but I don't think I can talk the guys here into spending the money to check it out. We've also had good luck with ATA/100 ide hard drives (ibm) on the Promise controller. We've gotten 50MB/sec reads and writes with "real" code. I like SCSI but it's hard to justify the expense when you consider that you can get a 64GB ide drive and an ATA/100 controller for under $350. My experience is that good SCSI drives fail just as often as good quality ide drives. Biggest drawback is -- for performance you should only use one drive per controller. Hope this helps -Don > I am seeking advice on some alternative Supermicro Motherboards/Chipsets > for a cluster. > > We are looking at the Supermicro 370DLE board, with ServerWorks > ServerSet III LE chipset for the nodes, and a 370 DL3 for the head. > The nodes would then use inexpensive IDE drives and fit in a 2U cabinet. > > Alternatively, it has been suggested to me that I should consider the > Supermicro 6010H 1U solution, which uses the 370 DER board with > ServerWorks III HE-SL chipset. Apparently, this motherboard has 2X > bandwidth to memory, and the board provides 2 100BaseT network > connections, but it requires more expensive (and/or smaller) SCSI > drives and is more expensive (an possibly noisier, to cool the 1U > case). > > Earlier discussions by this group suggest that there is not a > significant disadvantage to using IDE drives on nodes, but presumably > there is not much disadvantage (other than cost) to using SCSI disks. > > My questions: > > (1) Does anyone have experience with the HE-SL chipset? Are there any > benchmarks that indicate relative performance the HE-SL and LE Serverworks > chipsets? > > (2) Alternative motherboard/system suggestions? > > Bill Pearson > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list > Beowulf at beowulf.org > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Serverworks chip sets
- Next message: Serverworks chip sets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
