Scyld and fstab for Diskless slaves
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chip Coldwell coldwell at frank.harvard.eduTue Dec 19 09:12:41 PST 2000
- Previous message: Scyld and fstab for Diskless slaves
- Next message: Scyld and fstab for Diskless slaves
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Erik Arjan Hendriks wrote: > The floppy is really just a generic netboot. It contains its own > kernel and ramdisk. It downloads another kernel and another ramdisk. > The download works via TCP because TFTP is flaky under load. TCP will > fall down too at some point but it will do so later than TFTP and it > was easy to implement for a first cut. Let me see if I understand you correctly: each node initially boots from floppy and then goes through a sort of second-stage boot that sets up the ramdisk, etc., is that right? So a local floppy disk is required on every node? Have you ever tried doing this with PXE? Or does the PXE reliance on tftp (even multicast tftp) make it undesirable? Chip -- Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell "Turn on, log in, tune out"
- Previous message: Scyld and fstab for Diskless slaves
- Next message: Scyld and fstab for Diskless slaves
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
