Serverworks LE versus VIA Chipset
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Erik Paulson epaulson at students.wisc.eduFri Dec 15 15:05:25 PST 2000
- Previous message: ftpfs (was: Re: HD cloning)
- Next message: Serverworks LE versus VIA Chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, In building our compute farm, we're currently torn between choosing a SuperMicro 370DLE-based system, and a MicroStar MS-694D based machine. The SuperMicro uses Registered ECC memory, whereas the MS-694D is just using regular ECC memory. The CPU's we'll be using are either Intel PIII 933 or 1 Ghz, and we're planning on putting 1 Gig per machine (using 4 256 Meg DIMMS, we don't ever plan on upgrading them) These machines are going to have a varied set of applications running on them - CPU simulators for our Comp. Arch. group, Gaussian for Comp Chem, a High-Energy physics event-reconstruction code, QCD codes, and mathmatical optimization codes, just to name a few. The price in choosing between these two options is 97,000, which we could use to take 50 of them to be 2 Gig machines :) My questions to the list: 1. Has anyone used the Microstar board? Is it reliable at all? 2. Has anyone run any scientific codes on a MS-694D? This board seems to be all the rage among the overclocker and game community, and as much as I'd like to build a 150-node Quake farm I think the review committee would be a bit unhappy :) 3. What would the coolest, has anyone ever benchmarked their codes on identical CPUs between these two boards? Thanks a lot! (Aren't you glad it's a ServerWorks post but I didn't once ask about the SE vs the HE? :)
- Previous message: ftpfs (was: Re: HD cloning)
- Next message: Serverworks LE versus VIA Chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
