Chipsets and memory speed...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at coffee.psychology.mcmaster.caTue Dec 12 17:42:35 PST 2000
- Previous message: Chipsets and memory speed...
- Next message: Chipsets and memory speed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Anyone know the difference in bandwidth/stream performance between a PC with > a Duron vs an Athlon cpu? Is there much/any difference? none: duron and thunderbird differ only in size of onchip cache (192K vs 384K - those are actual capacities; coppermine's is 256K). > I looked at the stream benchmark pages, but didn't find any benchmarks using > the Duron. here's one: Function Rate (MB/s) RMS time Min time Max time Assignment: 525.1589 0.0305 0.0305 0.0306 Scaling : 505.7214 0.0317 0.0316 0.0317 Summing : 553.1737 0.0434 0.0434 0.0435 SAXPYing : 523.9031 0.0458 0.0458 0.0459 that's for a duron/600, 128M PC133 sdram (cas2, I think - bios doesn't say). it's interesting to consider the "efficiency" of various cpu/northbridge/dram combinations. the above machine delivers 500-550 MB/s out of a theoretical (never-possible) 1066 MB/s: 47% efficiency. good old PII/bx/PC100 boxes would deliver 3-400 MB/s out of 800 MB/s: around the same efficiency. i840 machines seem to max out at around 550 MB/s out of 3200, for a record of around 17% efficiency! otoh, rumor has it that i850's deliver more like 1400/3200, back into the 40-50% range, and well into Alpha territory... of course, stream doesn't credit the machine for write-allocate traffic, which would "improve" the numbers by 3/2 or 4/3... regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: Chipsets and memory speed...
- Next message: Chipsets and memory speed...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
