SCI vs Myrinet for Alpha
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tom Morris Tom.Morris at alpha-processor.comTue Aug 29 13:23:06 PDT 2000
- Previous message: SCI vs Myrinet for Alpha
- Next message: ITBL Project from Japan ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Bremner [SMTP:bremner at unb.ca] wrote: > Having noticed that Dolphin now has supposedly support for Alpha (look > on www.alphanews.net for links), I wonder if there are > compelling reasons to consider SCI instead of Myrinet. > > I am looking at about 8 2 proc UP2000 nodes What are your buying criteria? Bandwidth? Latency? Price? Each of the interconnects currently supporting Alpha (Myricom, Dolphin/Scali, Quadrics) has different strengths. I have clusters using all three. When do you plan to buy? Myricom has introduced interface cards with higher link speeds and has said that they will soon introduce matching switches. Scali has said that it will soon introduce a new generation of product with 64-bit PCI and higher speed links. > 1) The drivers are not open source. Well, this is not just an > ideological issue for me; it seems like a bit of a maintenence > nightmare. It's worth asking vendors this question specifically rather than depending on past history because; a) the answer tends to change over time and b) their behavior is often modified by customer requests. > Well, it sounds like my mind is made up, but I am really just starting > to investigate. Are these two things mutually exclusive? :-) Tom
- Previous message: SCI vs Myrinet for Alpha
- Next message: ITBL Project from Japan ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
