Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Jon Tegner tegner at renget.se
Wed Apr 14 08:41:26 PDT 2010


I have no clue of how to do this "distillation process" - it is not my
field. How would you do this? Do you have the numbers for any cpu?



And Arrhenius - again, semiconductors is not my field - would a 10
degree rise halve the life span irrespective of activation energy and
temperature range?


On Apr 14, 2010 15:49 "Lux, Jim (337C)" <james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.gov>
wrote:

> Start with Arrhenius.. 10degree rise halves the life.
> 
> Actually, there’s a huge amount of information out there on
> semiconductor failure and life effects. It’s just not distilled down
> to
> a “for part #, here’s what happens”, because it depends on a lot of
> things.
> 
> 
> On 4/14/10 1:12 AM, "Jon Tegner" <> wrote:
> > > the max temp spec is not some arbitrary knob that the chip vendors
> > > choose out of spiteful anti-green-ness. I wouldn't be surprised to
> > > see some
> > >
> > > ****************************************************************
> > >
> > > Issue is not the temp spec of current cpus, problem is that it is
> > > hard to get relevant information. I haven't found any that states
> > > that the failure rate in year 5 should be significantly higher if
> > > you operate the cpu at 65 C instead of 55 C. I'm just saying this
> > > kind of information would be valuable (and I would be glad to find
> > > it).
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20100414/8e0b036e/attachment.html


More information about the Beowulf mailing list