[Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, Jim (337C) james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Apr 14 06:49:57 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure
- Next message: [Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Start with Arrhenius.. 10degree rise halves the life. Actually, there's a huge amount of information out there on semiconductor failure and life effects. It's just not distilled down to a "for part #, here's what happens", because it depends on a lot of things. On 4/14/10 1:12 AM, "Jon Tegner" <tegner at renget.se> wrote: the max temp spec is not some arbitrary knob that the chip vendors choose out of spiteful anti-green-ness. I wouldn't be surprised to see some **************************************************************** Issue is not the temp spec of current cpus, problem is that it is hard to get relevant information. I haven't found any that states that the failure rate in year 5 should be significantly higher if you operate the cpu at 65 C instead of 55 C. I'm just saying this kind of information would be valuable (and I would be glad to find it). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20100414/1260cb2f/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure
- Next message: [Beowulf] 96 cores in silent and small enclosure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
