[Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comFri Oct 9 14:14:21 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: >> A node on a pallet waiting for you do upgrade firmware is absolutely >> worthless. 1000 of them even more so. > > I'm not sure why you keep going on about bios updates. they're easy and > automatable, so not a real issue for clusters. no offense! Sorry, I just went off on a tangent when I was thinking about "what the service engineers ask" comment from "Buccaneer for Hire". I agree they aren't that important of a topic. Not even sure they are very necessary. On the other hand, thanks for your comments, I did not realize they were automable and relatively risk free. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
