[Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comFri Oct 9 09:47:23 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Buccaneer for Hire. <buccaneer at rocketmail.com> wrote: > We have also never had an issue with a vendor getting this information to us. They have to capture it anyway. In fact, we send then a spreadsheet with hostname and they fill in the rest of the information. We get the spreadsheet, I run a script for the that vendor and the DB is populated-a second. After that, as the nodes are placed in the rack and connected, when power is applied it starts to install!!! On paper. :) > That's a simple but efficient idea! Why did I not think of sending my vendor a spreadsheet before! :) Maybe I ought to automate service-tag collection as well! -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
