[Beowulf] RAID for home beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tomislav Maric tomislav.maric at gmx.comMon Oct 5 03:19:01 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RAID for home beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] RAID for home beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> the other nodes are to be diskless.. I have separated these partitions: >> /swap /boot / /var and /home. Is this ok? > > I don't believe there is much value in separating partitions like this. > for instance, a swap partition has no advantage over a swap file, > and the latter is generally more convenient. separating /boot is > largely a vestige of quite old bioses which could not do 48b LBA > addressing (ie, deal with big disks.) separating /, /var and /home > is largely a matter of taste: > > - separate /home means that you can blast / and /var when > you upgrade or change distros. > > - separating / and /var means that something like syslog or > mail can never fill up the root partition. which is generally > not a serious issue anyway: if anything, this argues for putting > /tmp in a separate partition, but leaving /var inside /... > > - more partitions (filesystems) means more time spent waiting > for disk heads to seek. remember that write activity on any fs > (modern, journaling) requires some synchronous writes, and > therefore can't be lazy-ified or elevator-scheduled when you have > multiple partitions. > > I think it's always a good idea to minimize partitions, though we can > probably argue about how many is best. I suppose one factor in favor > of separate, purpose-specific filesystems is that they might be split > into different raid levels. for instance, /tmp might be raid0, perhaps > /var a >2 disk raid10 for write speed, and /home left on /, both under > raid6. but given that you don't want multiple filesystems competing > for access to the same disk(s), I'm skeptical of this approach... > > in short, it's perfectly OK to use one big filesystem. or you can just > use the distro's default partitioning scheme. in the end it's not going > to make much difference. > > regards, mark hahn. > Thank you very much for the info. There so much of this stuff that's totally new to me. I think I'm going to feel very lucky if I ever get this thing to work properly. Best regards, Tomislav
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RAID for home beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] RAID for home beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
