[Beowulf] XEON power variations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSun Oct 4 21:31:29 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] XEON power variations
- Next message: [Beowulf] re: power prediction and planning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Rockwell wrote: > Hi, > > Intel assigns the same power consumption to different clockspeeds of L, > E, X series XEON. All L series have the same rating, all E series etc. Not quite. They provide the maximum power consumption/dissipation, and quite possibly bin these numbers over a range of parts. > So, taking their numbers, the fastest of each type will always have the > best performance per watt. And there is no power consumption penalty Well ... against the TDP bin, not necessarily in actuality. > for buying the fastest clockspeed of each type. Vendor's power > calculators reflect this (dell.com/calc for example). To me this seems These numbers come from Intel in most cases. > like marketing simplification... Anybody know any different, e.g. have binning. > you seen other numbers from vendors or tested systems yourself? We have a 2.93GHz Nehalem and a 3.2 GHz Nehalem that are almost identical. We could put a power meter on them if you'd like (I bought one a while ago for this purpose). I've found from a design perspective, that its always a better idea not to design for actual power, but to design for maximim power consumed, and then add some margin. Its far better to overestimate your power and cooling needs than to underestimate it. > Is the power consumption of a system with an E5502 CPU really the same > as one with an E5540? It's worth noting that the E5502 CPU is a 1.86GHz part, while E5540 is a 2.53GHz part. The power consumed in a CPU is a function of frequency. A linear dependence upon frequency would have the E5540 being 36% more power than the E5502. However, the 5502 is a dual core part, and the 5540 is a quad core part, so you get 2x the number of FLOPs out of the 5540. This would bias the performance per watt calculation if it weren't factored in correctly. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics, Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] XEON power variations
- Next message: [Beowulf] re: power prediction and planning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
