[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comSat Oct 3 09:33:48 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Skylar Thompson <skylar at cs.earlham.edu> wrote: > Rahul Nabar wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Joe Landman >> <landman at scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > > In addition to the console, the other really useful feature of IPMI is > remote power cycling. That's useful when the console itself is totally > wedged. > True. That's a useful feature. But that "could" be done by sending "magic packets" to a eth card as well, right? I say "can" because I don't have that running on all my servers but had toyed with that on some. I guess, just many ways of doing the same thing. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
