[Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge hbugge at platform.comFri Mar 27 10:37:28 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 27, 2009, at 18:20 , Craig Tierney wrote: > What about using multi-rail to increase message rate? That isn't > the same as latency, but if you put messages on both wires you > should get more. Exactly why we saw almost 2x speedup on message rate (latency) sensitive apps using Platform MPI. We call the technique alternating; any communicating peer will use a HCA or port, but a single MPI process will alternate between different HCAs (or ports), depending on which peer he communicates with. Håkon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
