[Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caMon Jan 26 08:02:08 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Regarding numactl, we are using it and shows good results: > > numactl --hardware > available: 3 nodes (0-2) > node 0 size: 57280 MB > node 0 free: 32579 MB > node 1 size: 57255 MB > node 1 free: 55920 MB > node 2 size: 16371 MB > node 2 free: 16140 MB > > (on a 128GB system, SLES10SP1) sounds like an altix. yes, it works fine on our 64 node altix as well. what I'm wondering is how widespread it is to find commodity PCs that have inconsistent numactl output. incidentally, do you use node memory availability to balance job/thread placement?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] ECC exerciser/exorciser?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list