[Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nifty Tom Mitchell niftyompi at niftyegg.comWed Jan 21 17:18:45 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:36:51PM -0800, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:19:55PM -0800, Jon Forrest wrote: > > > The > > last time I checked, the enterprise drives were ~25% > > more expensive than the consumer drives. This difference > > might have changed since then. > > Last time I checked, it was +$10 on a $300 drive. I bought > the enterprise drives. > > My local system reseller claims there's a substantial difference in > return rate. I'd love to have harder data. I suspect that the difference is in subtle and in the BOM. A ten dollar difference could be as simple as heat sink or capacitor thermal specifications. The heat sink could be invisible -- i.e. more/ thicker copper on the logic board Contract manufacturers may also bring better quality practices to the table. Different internal filters, bearing seal or lubrication specifications may also apply. I doubt that firmware is different. -- Regards, T o m M i t c h e l l
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Consumer vs. Enterprise Hard Drives in Clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
