[Beowulf] KVM advice
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
stephen mulcahy smulcahy at aplpi.comFri Jan 16 07:17:52 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Next message: [Beowulf] KVM advice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Do people here normally use KVMs for management of compute nodes or forego those and either have a grad student with a keyboard+monitor on a trolley or rely entirely on remote management cards and/or IPMI? For those of you that use KVMs, what ones do you normally use? I'm taking a look around at the moment and for 40+ nodes, KVMs look like quite an expensive option. It's not clear either how well or which KVMs can be operated remotely. The scenario I have is that I have ~40 nodes in a room and I would like to hook a KVM switch to all of these and be able to connect to the switch from other parts of the building. I see Avocent (for example) have some switches that kinda fit this model - but its not clear whether the Avocents can be accessed over a standard Ethernet LAN, or whether you have to run a dedicated CAT5 cable around your building specifically to connect to the KVM switch. Any experience from others on this welcome, I've mostly relied on post-boot remote access, remote management cards and IPMI up to now. Thanks, -stephen -- Stephen Mulcahy Applepie Solutions Ltd. http://www.aplpi.com Registered in Ireland, no. 289353 (5 Woodlands Avenue, Renmore, Galway)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Nehalem and Shanghai code performance for our rzf example
- Next message: [Beowulf] KVM advice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
