[Beowulf] bonding.txt really confusing, why don't I get higher aggregate bandwidth from multiple TCP connections from multiple gigabit clients with balance-alb bonding on a server?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Sabuj Pattanayek sabujp at gmail.comSat Feb 21 08:39:02 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] bonding.txt really confusing, why don't I get higher aggregate bandwidth from multiple TCP connections from multiple gigabit clients with balance-alb bonding on a server?
- Next message: [Beowulf] bonding.txt really confusing, why don't I get higher aggregate bandwidth from multiple TCP connections from multiple gigabit clients with balance-alb bonding on a server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Are you certain the MAC spoofing is working? I'd check the ARP tables on > your systems, and maybe sniff the wire to see if the right ARP > broadcasts are going out. Route shows that only bond0 has a routing table. The arp tables on the clients i run netperf on show either the mac address of eth0 or eth1 on the server. When I run netperf on the clients I can see that they are either connecting to eth0 or eth1 using iftop. However, I still can't get more than 1gbps.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] bonding.txt really confusing, why don't I get higher aggregate bandwidth from multiple TCP connections from multiple gigabit clients with balance-alb bonding on a server?
- Next message: [Beowulf] bonding.txt really confusing, why don't I get higher aggregate bandwidth from multiple TCP connections from multiple gigabit clients with balance-alb bonding on a server?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list