[Beowulf] 10 GbE
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Feb 11 17:36:37 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 10 GbE
- Next message: [Beowulf] 10 GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:57:01PM +0000, Igor Kozin wrote: > - Switch latency (btw, the data sheet says x86 inside); Since almost all of the "latency" is in the endpoints, the best way to measure this is with 0, 1, 2 switches between 2 nodes. If your measurements are accurate enough (look at the dispersion), you can see the switch latency. > - Netxen NX3-20GxR card vs Intel 10 GbE AD DA card. Endpoint latency for ethernet cards depends on a lot of things; describing them with "latency" and "bandwidth" is perhaps even sillier than doing so for InfiniBand. MPI programs with short, bursty communications are not so well suited for TCP offload engines, which are aimed at reducing overhead for big transfers. For MPI, it's much more ideal to do what Myricom is doing. Other than that, you may find that dumb cards do better than offload cards, OpenMX does better than MPI over TCP, and the more neighbors you're talking to, the worse TCP offload does. I suspect it has a lot more variables than the typical interconnect evaluation that Daresbury does. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 10 GbE
- Next message: [Beowulf] 10 GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
