[Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kilian CAVALOTTI kilian.cavalotti.work at gmail.comWed Feb 4 10:09:47 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 15:08:12 Robert G. Brown wrote: > Or use slow, slow, slow processors (but a lot of > them). > > The latter isn't a crazy idea, depending on the kind of task this > faster-that-fastest system is supposed to be faster on. Some sort of > massively SIMD decomposable problem with minimal nonlocal IPCs where the > per-processor tasks are modest and nearly independent would get the > near-linear scaling required to use up 1.6 million cores, and it would > explain the 1 MB of memory per core. Consider each node as representing > (say) 10,000 neurons and you've got a 16 billion neuron neural net with > some sort of semilocal topology. Not bad, actually. Isn't that the idea behind SGI's Molecule concept? http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2008/november/project_kelvin.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/20/sgi_molecule_concept/ Cheers, -- Kilian
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
