[Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kilian CAVALOTTI kilian.cavalotti.work at gmail.comWed Feb 4 05:19:00 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi John, On Tuesday 03 February 2009 18:25:04 John Hearns wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/03/llnl_buys_ibm_supers/ > > I make this 400 cores per 1U rack unit. How is the counting being done > here? Even for the intermediate "development" system, Dawn, the article quotes 150,000 cores in 36 racks. Which makes about 100 cores in a 1U space. That's a hell of a density... > This article says 4096 cores per rack: > http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/ibms-sequoia-20x-faster-than-the-worlds- >fastest-supercomputer/ That seems more rational - 93 racks adds up to 380928 > cores An even weirdest number around this system is the amount of memory listed. 1.6TB of main memory for 1.6 million cores, that's a mere 1 MB per core... I hope it's a P, not a T. Cheers, -- Kilian
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Next message: [Beowulf] IBM Sequoia
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
