[Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, James P james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govThu Apr 30 11:57:55 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Landman [mailto:landman at scalableinformatics.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:35 AM > To: Lux, James P > Cc: Tom Pierce; vlad at geociencias.unam.mx; beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster > > Lux, James P wrote: > > > > > Actually, this isn't particularly surprising to folks who deal with > > electrical power. It *is* surprising to folks who see > volts*amps (VA) > > and think it means watts. > > > > Most power conversion equipment has a higher VA rating than Watt > > rating (and, so do most loads, so it works out ok in practice) PF > > (Power Factor) = Watts/VA, and a typical PF is around 0.85. > > Most of the advice we've been given about "arbitrary" gear > from power folks has been to use 0.7 (approximately > 1/sqrt(2)) as your PF, to account for varying supply quality > and leave an engineering margin (for error). Indeed, looking > at some of the PF curves for supplies under heavy load shows > PF for "85%" supplies dipping into the mid to upper 70s. > > Yuck.. I think a power supply that bad would have trouble passing the usual regulatory standards (IEC, UL), which put limits on the power factor. See, e.g., EN61000-3-2 (which became mandatory on 1 Jan 2001) "80 plus" requires PF>0.9
- Previous message: [Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] UPS system for Linux cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
