[Beowulf] Moores Law is dying
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Apr 15 13:00:14 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Moores Law is dying
- Next message: [Beowulf] Moores Law is dying
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:44:17PM -0700, Christian Bell wrote: > Sure, capacity and conflict misses will apply like > they do in any cache but Jon's statement remains correct -- in SPMD > applications, you really want all processes to benefit from cache hits in > your "single program". ... then why do vendors make such a fuss about duplicating program text pages in big NUMA machines? As an example: www.sc2001.org/papers/pap.pap241.pdf The issue is that fetching from distant memory is expensive, even if there's no writing going on. Locality, locality, locality. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Moores Law is dying
- Next message: [Beowulf] Moores Law is dying
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
